Celeron G1610T vs Xeon W3520
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /8
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2012
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.35k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
4.89k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.9k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.82k (x1.01)
TOTAL
20.84k
17.96k (x0.86)
Multithread
G1610T
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
29.69k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
22.26k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
14.91k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
6.29k (x1.81)
TOTAL
38.59k
73.16k (x1.9)
Performance/W
G1610T
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4