Celeron G1610T vs Xeon L5430
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2012
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
51.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
3.09k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
6.86k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.66k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.01k (x1.08)
TOTAL
20.84k
15.62k (x0.75)
Multithread
G1610T
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
12.4k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
27.27k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
10.41k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
1.57k (x0.45)
TOTAL
38.59k
51.64k (x1.34)
Performance/W
G1610T
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
1033 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4