Celeron G1610T vs Pentium G2020
Description
Both models G1610T and G2020 are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the G2020 gets 42.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the G2020 gets 42.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
25.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
42.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.94k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
8.23k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
3.69k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.46k (x0.9)
TOTAL
14.62k
17.33k (x1.19)
Multithread
G1610T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
5.54k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
15.47k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
7.06k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.99k (x1.18)
TOTAL
25.8k
31.05k (x1.2)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
9.9k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
9.01k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.87k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.09k (x1.11)
TOTAL
20.84k
25.87k (x1.24)
Multithread
G1610T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
18.83k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
14.15k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
6.61k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.81k (x0.81)
TOTAL
38.59k
42.39k (x1.1)
Performance/W
G1610T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
257 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
771 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3415 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
3107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1065 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
8921 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4