Celeron G1610T vs Core 2 Duo E8400 | Hardlimit Benchmark Central

Celeron G1610T vs Core 2 Duo E8400

Both Celeron G1610T and Core 2 Duo E8400 monothread performance are pretty similar although their multithread performance are slightly different. These two models were released four years apart which doesn't explain their performance similarity in monothread performance so we should check if they belong to the same range.

Comparison

Specs

Celeron G1610T

Core 2 Duo E8400

Base frequency
2300 MHz
3000 MHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
2
TDP
35 W
65 W
L1 cache
32+32 kb
32+32 kb
L2 cache
256 kb
6144 kb
L3 cache
2048 kb
-
Proccess
0,022 um
0,045 um
# transistors
-
420 M
Core
-
Wolfdale
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Core
Release date
12/2012
1/2008

Monothread performance

Mode 0 [FPU]
14713
16827 [+14.37%]
Mode I [SSE3]
20920
17284 [-21.04%]

Multithread performance

Mode 0 [FPU]
26290
25114 [-4.68%]
Mode I [SSE3]
39524
27771 [-42.32%]

Stats

Perf per MHz Mode 0
6.4
5.61 [-14.08%]
Perf per MHz Mode I
9.1
5.76 [-57.99%]
Perf per watt Mode 0
751.14
386.37 [-94.41%]
Perf per watt Mode I
1129.26
427.25 [-164.31%]

Overclocking

The best frequency
-
3836 MHz
Second-best frequency
-
3836 MHz
Third-best frequency
-
3836 MHz

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 2.4.5