Celeron G1610T vs Core i7-920
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2012
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
47.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
1.97k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
4.43k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.75k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.53k (x0.92)
TOTAL
14.62k
11.68k (x0.8)
Multithread
G1610T
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
7.71k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
18.81k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
13.76k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
5.07k (x2.01)
TOTAL
25.8k
45.34k (x1.76)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
6.12k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
4.76k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.78k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.67k (x0.96)
TOTAL
20.84k
16.33k (x0.78)
Multithread
G1610T
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
19.26k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
14.96k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
8.05k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
4.92k (x1.41)
TOTAL
38.59k
47.2k (x1.22)
Performance/W
G1610T
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
363 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4