| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ec
Core
Ivy Bridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2012
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
143.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
3.68k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
16.08k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
4.99k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
7.95k (x2.9)
TOTAL
14.62k
32.69k (x2.24)

Multithread

G1610T

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
14.29k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
61.15k (x4.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
16.53k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.72k (x1.47)
TOTAL
25.8k
95.69k (x3.71)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
13.6k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
20.03k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
5.19k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
7.05k (x2.53)
TOTAL
20.84k
45.87k (x2.2)

Multithread

G1610T

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
51.42k (x3.4)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
77.48k (x5.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
16.65k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.69k (x1.06)
TOTAL
38.59k
149.24k (x3.87)

Performance/W
G1610T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
3428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
5165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
1110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
5135 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1332 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1808 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
11762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4