Celeron G1610T vs Core i5-2520M
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 25.8 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2520M is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 25.8 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2520M is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
24.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
50.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.69k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
7.28k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
3.84k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.05k (x1.12)
TOTAL
14.62k
16.86k (x1.15)
Multithread
G1610T
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
6.08k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
16.15k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
8.87k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.06k (x1.21)
TOTAL
25.8k
34.15k (x1.32)
Performance/W
G1610T
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
133 points/W
174 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
737 points/W
976 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1019 points/GHz
840 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2842 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1305 points/GHz
1200 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
6357 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4