| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
67.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.02k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
8.2k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.63k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.92k (x1.43)
TOTAL
14.62k
16.77k (x1.15)

Multithread

G1610T

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
3.83k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
17.17k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
5.77k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.62k (x1.43)
TOTAL
25.8k
30.39k (x1.18)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.28k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
10.51k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.81k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.88k (x1.03)
TOTAL
20.84k
23.48k (x1.13)

Multithread

G1610T

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
14.98k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
23.68k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
6.37k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.43k (x0.7)
TOTAL
38.59k
47.46k (x1.23)

Performance/W
G1610T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
3164 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4