| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Core i3-10105


Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i3-10105 gets 190.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 4.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2012
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
4.5k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
18.39k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
5.78k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
8.3k (x3.03)
TOTAL
14.62k
36.97k (x2.53)

Multithread

G1610T

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
16.13k (x3.46)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
75.62k (x5.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
27.88k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.57k (x1.42)
TOTAL
25.8k
123.2k (x4.78)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
16.19k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
23.07k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
6.04k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
8.46k (x3.04)
TOTAL
20.84k
53.77k (x2.58)

Multithread

G1610T

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
57.59k (x3.81)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
100.63k (x7.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
28.59k (x4.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.56k (x1.02)
TOTAL
38.59k
190.38k (x4.93)

Performance/W
G1610T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1548 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
440 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
2929 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
5244 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1923 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
12219 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4