Celeron G1610T vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 260 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.4 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.4 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
100f63
Core
Ivy Bridge
Regor
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
December 2012
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
6.04k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
6.2k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.11k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
1.7k (x0.61)
TOTAL
20.84k
17.05k (x0.82)
Multithread
G1610T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
10.02k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
10.18k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
5.1k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.25k (x0.65)
TOTAL
38.59k
27.54k (x0.71)
Performance/W
G1610T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
260
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4