Celeron G1610T vs A6 3500
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
300f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Llano
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
3/3
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
3x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2012
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
4.75k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
4.72k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.49k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
1.69k (x0.61)
TOTAL
20.84k
13.65k (x0.65)
Multithread
G1610T
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
12.56k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
12.58k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
6.08k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
1.49k (x0.43)
TOTAL
38.59k
32.72k (x0.85)
Performance/W
G1610T
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4