Celeron E3300 vs Xeon E5472
Description
Both models E3300 and E5472 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Wolfdale
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2009
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
48.62k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.29k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
5.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.44k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
4.81k (x4.75)
TOTAL
11.66k
15.39k (x1.32)
Multithread
E3300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
9.06k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
23.09k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
9.7k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
2.53k (x2.44)
TOTAL
22.16k
44.38k (x2)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
2.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
6.36k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.55k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
4.83k (x4.49)
TOTAL
12.94k
16.62k (x1.28)
Multithread
E3300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
11.19k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
24.85k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
10.04k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
2.54k (x2.51)
TOTAL
24.6k
48.62k (x1.98)
Performance/W
E3300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
608 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4