Celeron E3300 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 22.2 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 4.7 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 22.2 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 4.7 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
50657
Core
Wolfdale
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2009
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.97k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
8.15k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.37k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
4.84k (x4.78)
TOTAL
11.66k
17.32k (x1.49)
Multithread
E3300
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
15.73k (x3.44)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
64.78k (x5.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
18.06k (x3.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
5.21k (x5.02)
TOTAL
22.16k
103.77k (x4.68)
Performance/W
E3300
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
70 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
179 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
341 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
916 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2347 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
995 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
405 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
4663 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4