Celeron E3300 vs Core Duo T2300
Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 2.6 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 2.6 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
6e8
Core
Wolfdale
Yonah
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.66 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
31 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2009
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
5.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
9.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
1.46k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
1.63k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.53k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
0.96k (x0.89)
TOTAL
12.94k
5.58k (x0.43)
Multithread
E3300
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
2.42k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
2.95k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.01k (x1)
TOTAL
24.6k
9.38k (x0.38)
Performance/W
E3300
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
95 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
97 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
303 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
882 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
924 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
578 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
3364 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4