Celeron 4205U vs Pentium G3260
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.6 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.6 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
11.73k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
10.45k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
4.55k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
3.83k (x1.64)
TOTAL
20.61k
30.56k (x1.48)
Multithread
4205U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
22.99k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
20.53k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
8.82k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
6.55k (x3)
TOTAL
37.61k
58.89k (x1.57)
Performance/W
4205U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4