Celeron 4205U vs N5095
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906c0
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
10.08k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
10.11k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
4.06k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.36k (x1.01)
TOTAL
20.61k
26.6k (x1.29)
Multithread
4205U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
36.86k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
38.51k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
15.17k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.72k (x1.24)
TOTAL
37.61k
93.26k (x2.48)
Performance/W
4205U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4