Celeron 4205U vs A6 9210
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
670f00
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
4.87k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
10.38k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.59k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.38k (x1.02)
TOTAL
20.61k
20.22k (x0.98)
Multithread
4205U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
7.41k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
11.87k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
3.35k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.6k (x1.19)
TOTAL
37.61k
25.23k (x0.67)
Performance/W
4205U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4