Celeron 4205U vs A6 3600
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
300f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Llano
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
4.03k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
4.25k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.19k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
1.54k (x0.66)
TOTAL
20.61k
12.01k (x0.58)
Multithread
4205U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
15.66k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
16.66k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
8.33k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
3.48k (x1.59)
TOTAL
37.61k
44.12k (x1.17)
Performance/W
4205U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4