Celeron 3855U vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.1 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.1 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
10676
Core
Skylake-U
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
2.88k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
6.31k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.53k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1.35k (x0.54)
TOTAL
19.24k
13.08k (x0.68)
Multithread
3855U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
5.45k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
11.5k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
4.02k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1.05k (x0.42)
TOTAL
24.56k
22.02k (x0.9)
Performance/W
3855U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4