| | | | | | |

Celeron 3855U vs A9 9420


Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.2 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
670f00
Core
Skylake-U
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
46.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3855U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1.64k
2.56k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
6.72k
9.97k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
2.96k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
2.12k (x0.88)
TOTAL
12.83k
17.61k (x1.37)

Multithread

3855U

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2.2k
3.88k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
9.59k
9.26k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.9k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.27k
1.74k (x0.77)
TOTAL
16.81k
18.79k (x1.12)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
8.41k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
11.48k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
3.29k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.24k (x0.89)
TOTAL
19.24k
25.41k (x1.32)

Multithread

3855U

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
11.25k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
13.69k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
2.09k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1.87k (x0.75)
TOTAL
24.56k
28.89k (x1.18)

Performance/W
3855U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
1926 points/W

Performance/GHz
3855U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4