| | | |

Celeron D 331 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200


Description
The 331 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E2200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 331 gets a score of 0 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E2200 is INF times faster than the 331. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f41
6fd
Core
Prescott-256
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Date
Jun 2005
December 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
331
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
1379
2215 (60.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
2459
2215 (-9.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194
2216 (85.56%)
Test#1 (Memory)
615
1169 (90.04%)
TOTAL
5647
7815 (38.38%)

Multithread

331

E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
0
4409 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
4420 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
4445 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1181 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
14455 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
331
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
1856
2527 (36.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
2957
2297 (-22.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1414
2306 (63.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
619
1165 (88.20%)
TOTAL
6847
8294 (21.14%)

Multithread

331

E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
0
5060 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
4582 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
4614 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1181 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
15436 (inf%)

Performance/W
331
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
237 points/W

Performance/GHz
331
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
696 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
530 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
232 points/GHz
529 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8