| | | | | | |

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Xeon E5506


Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 5 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
106a5
Core
Cherry Trail
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
2 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
0.86k
1.21k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
1.39k
2.75k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.21k
1.94k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
0.78k (x0.95)
TOTAL
4.28k
6.68k (x1.56)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2.73k
12.25k (x4.49)
Test#2 (FP)
4.37k
25.55k (x5.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.74k
17.1k (x4.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
5.01k (x4.92)
TOTAL
11.85k
59.9k (x5.05)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
4.48k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
2.99k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
1.81k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
0.69k (x1.05)
TOTAL
6.67k
9.97k (x1.49)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
41k (x4.83)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
28.17k (x5.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
17.4k (x5.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
3.88k (x4.13)
TOTAL
17.99k
90.45k (x5.03)

Performance/W
x5-Z8350
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4