| | | | | | |

Atom Z520 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The Z520 is based on Bonnell architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z520 gets a score of 3.6 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 10.5 times faster than the Z520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106c2
506e3
Core
Silverthorne
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.333 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.333 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 441
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
1 /2
4/8
TDP
2 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2008
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
2.72k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
3.6k points
37.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Z520
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
0.3k
0.7k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
0.63k
2.8k (x4.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.64k
0.85k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.3k
1.88k (x6.3)
TOTAL
1.86k
6.23k (x3.34)

Multithread

Z520

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
0.46k
2.74k (x5.9)
Test#2 (FP)
0.99k
12.87k (x12.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.85k
3.89k (x4.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.43k
6.03k (x14.1)
TOTAL
2.74k
25.52k (x9.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Z520
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
0.9k
2.59k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
0.71k
3.94k (x5.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
1k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.37k
2k (x5.38)
TOTAL
2.72k
9.52k (x3.5)

Multithread

Z520

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
10.4k (x9.84)
Test#2 (FP)
1.08k
16.64k (x15.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.06k
4.51k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.41k
6.33k (x15.59)
TOTAL
3.6k
37.88k (x10.53)

Performance/W
Z520
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
528 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
528 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
1800 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z520
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
530 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
560 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
2040 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4