Atom N270 vs Core i5-520M
Description
The N270 is based on Bonnell architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N270 gets a score of 4.4 k points while the i5-520M gets 26.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 6 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N270 gets a score of 4.4 k points while the i5-520M gets 26.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 6 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106c2
20655
Core
Diamondville
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 437
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
1 /2
2/4
TDP
3 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2008
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
3.18k points
13.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
4.43k points
26.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N270
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.02k
5.41k (x5.29)
Test#2 (FP)
0.85k
3.69k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.93k
2.12k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.37k
1.88k (x5.02)
TOTAL
3.18k
13.1k (x4.12)
Multithread
N270
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.31k
10.7k (x8.15)
Test#2 (FP)
1.36k
7.91k (x5.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.33k
5.08k (x3.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.42k
2.58k (x6.16)
TOTAL
4.43k
26.27k (x5.93)
Performance/W
N270
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
437 points/W
306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
454 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
145 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
1477 points/W
751 points/W
Performance/GHz
N270
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
638 points/GHz
1844 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
534 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
580 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
234 points/GHz
641 points/GHz
TOTAL
1986 points/GHz
4466 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4