| | | | | | |

Xeon w3-2423 vs W-2223


Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806f8
50657
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
120 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
8448 kB
Date
February 2023
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
25.09k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
20.76k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
5.07k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
8.76k (x1.27)
TOTAL
46.97k
59.68k (x1.27)

Multithread

w3-2423

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
111.43k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
100.2k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
24.67k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
6.89k (x0.76)
TOTAL
254.28k
243.18k (x0.96)

Performance/W
w3-2423
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
w3-2423
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4