Xeon w3-2423 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 1.2 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 1.2 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
50657
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
120 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
11264 kB
Date
February 2023
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
12.92k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
10.97k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
2.54k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
5.09k (x0.74)
TOTAL
46.97k
31.52k (x0.67)
Multithread
w3-2423
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
103.33k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
87.67k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
20.1k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
4.91k (x0.54)
TOTAL
254.28k
216.02k (x0.85)
Performance/W
w3-2423
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4