Xeon w3-2423 vs Core i5-9600K
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.5 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.5 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
906ed
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
120 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
9216 kB
Date
February 2023
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
77.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
372.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
30.64k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
26.75k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
6.33k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
14.03k (x2.03)
TOTAL
46.97k
77.75k (x1.66)
Multithread
w3-2423
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
174.92k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
153.88k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
35.93k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
8k (x0.88)
TOTAL
254.28k
372.74k (x1.47)
Performance/W
w3-2423
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
1620 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
378 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
3924 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
6661 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16902 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4