Xeon w3-2423 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
306d4
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
Cores/Threads
6/12
2 /4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2023
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
13.58k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
12.14k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
3.18k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
2.92k (x0.42)
TOTAL
46.97k
31.81k (x0.68)
Multithread
w3-2423
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
28.89k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
28.74k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
7.31k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
3.74k (x0.41)
TOTAL
254.28k
68.69k (x0.27)
Performance/W
w3-2423
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4