Xeon w3-2423 vs Core i5-10500
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.5 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.5 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
a0653
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
387.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
28.73k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
26.01k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
6.08k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
14.46k (x2.09)
TOTAL
46.97k
75.27k (x1.6)
Multithread
w3-2423
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
172.66k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
167.57k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
39.45k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
8.31k (x0.92)
TOTAL
254.28k
387.99k (x1.53)
Performance/W
w3-2423
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
5969 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4