Xeon w3-2423 vs Core i3-8145U
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 3.4 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 3.4 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
806eb
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2023
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
17.78k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
12.8k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
2.61k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
1.3k (x0.19)
TOTAL
46.97k
34.48k (x0.73)
Multithread
w3-2423
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
28.06k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
34.83k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
9.69k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
2.55k (x0.28)
TOTAL
254.28k
75.13k (x0.3)
Performance/W
w3-2423
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4