Xeon w3-2423 vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
a0653
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
227.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
24.31k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
22.15k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
5.14k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
8.46k (x1.23)
TOTAL
46.97k
60.06k (x1.28)
Multithread
w3-2423
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
101.48k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
98.04k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
24.28k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
3.86k (x0.43)
TOTAL
254.28k
227.67k (x0.9)
Performance/W
w3-2423
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4