| | | | | | |

Xeon w3-2423 vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 6800H gets 485.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.9 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806f8
a40f41
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Rembrandt
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Sapphire Rapids
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
79.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
485.06k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
21.57k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
23.39k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
10.63k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
24.29k (x3.52)
TOTAL
46.97k
79.87k (x1.7)

Multithread

w3-2423

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
161.42k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
217.92k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
91.69k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
14.03k (x1.55)
TOTAL
254.28k
485.06k (x1.91)

Performance/W
w3-2423
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
3587 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
4843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
2037 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
312 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
10779 points/W

Performance/GHz
w3-2423
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
4589 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
4976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
2261 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
5168 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16994 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4