Xeon w3-2423 vs Ryzen 7 5800U
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.2 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.2 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
a50f00
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
314.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
18.34k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
22.78k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
9.45k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
20.59k (x2.98)
TOTAL
46.97k
71.16k (x1.52)
Multithread
w3-2423
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
102.74k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
143.27k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
58.13k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
10.41k (x1.15)
TOTAL
254.28k
314.55k (x1.24)
Performance/W
w3-2423
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
20970 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4