| | | | | | |

Xeon w3-2423 vs Ryzen 5 5600H


Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 1 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806f8
a50f00
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Cezanne
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2023
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
255.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
14.34k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
17.67k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
6.41k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
14.95k (x2.17)
TOTAL
46.97k
53.37k (x1.14)

Multithread

w3-2423

5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
83.58k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
119.22k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
48.56k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
3.83k (x0.42)
TOTAL
254.28k
255.19k (x1)

Performance/W
w3-2423
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
5671 points/W

Performance/GHz
w3-2423
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4