Xeon w3-2423 vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.3 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.3 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
860f01
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
15.48k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
22.82k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
8.63k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
7.17k (x1.04)
TOTAL
46.97k
54.11k (x1.15)
Multithread
w3-2423
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
117.98k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
146.43k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
65.54k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
4.77k (x0.53)
TOTAL
254.28k
334.72k (x1.32)
Performance/W
w3-2423
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4