| | | | | | |

Xeon w3-2423 vs Core i3-1125G4


Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.

Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806f8
806c1
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
120 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
56.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
241.03k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
22.63k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
17.36k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
8.89k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
7.37k (x1.07)
TOTAL
46.97k
56.25k (x1.2)

Multithread

w3-2423

i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
103.42k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
102.39k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
32.17k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
3.05k (x0.34)
TOTAL
254.28k
241.03k (x0.95)

Performance/W
w3-2423
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
3657 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
8608 points/W

Performance/GHz
w3-2423
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
6116 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
1992 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
15203 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4