| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs N95


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the gets 105.6 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 2.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b06e0
Core
Glacier Falls
Gracemont
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
39.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
105.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
3.41k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
8.58k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
6.71k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
7.3k (x0.89)
TOTAL
31.45k
25.99k (x0.83)

Multithread

W-2223

Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
10.79k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
26.75k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
21.56k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
3.98k (x0.58)
TOTAL
104.51k
63.07k (x0.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
15.57k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
11.5k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
6.06k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
6.36k (x0.73)
TOTAL
59.68k
39.5k (x0.66)

Multithread

W-2223

Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
46.51k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
35.31k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
19.27k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
4.49k (x0.65)
TOTAL
243.18k
105.57k (x0.43)

Performance/W
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3100 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
1285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
299 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
7038 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
4579 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
3382 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1783 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1872 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
11617 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4