Xeon Silver 4208 vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.8 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.8 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a50f00
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Barcelo-R
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
171.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
8.81k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
10.18k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
4.31k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
8.66k (x1.38)
TOTAL
38.61k
31.96k (x0.83)
Multithread
Silver 4208
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
55.98k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
76k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
34.38k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.04k (x0.59)
TOTAL
311.57k
171.39k (x0.55)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
11426 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4