Xeon Silver 4208 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 4.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 4.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Dali
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
30.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
76.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
8.68k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
16.03k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
3.5k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.76k (x0.44)
TOTAL
38.61k
30.97k (x0.8)
Multithread
Silver 4208
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
21.73k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
40.56k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
9.77k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.96k (x0.46)
TOTAL
311.57k
76.01k (x0.24)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
1449 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2704 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
651 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5068 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
4581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
8849 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4