| | | | | | |

Xeon E5645 vs Pentium Silver N6000


Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the Silver N6000 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the Silver N6000 gets 45.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5645 is 1.7 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
906c0
Core
Westmere-EP
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/4
TDP
80 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2010
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
17.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
45.72k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5645
Silver N6000
Test#1 (Integers)
6.47k
6.32k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
4.4k
6.96k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.43k
2.35k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.75k (x0.75)
TOTAL
15.64k
17.38k (x1.11)

Multithread

E5645

Silver N6000
Test#1 (Integers)
34.43k
16.32k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.23k
19.44k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
6.67k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.29k (x0.86)
TOTAL
76.96k
45.72k (x0.59)

Performance/W
E5645
Silver N6000
Test#1 (Integers)
430 points/W
2719 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
303 points/W
3240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
1111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
549 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
7620 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5645
Silver N6000
Test#1 (Integers)
2311 points/GHz
1916 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1573 points/GHz
2108 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
867 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
833 points/GHz
530 points/GHz
TOTAL
5584 points/GHz
5267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4