| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-4640 vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the 5950X gets 789.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.4 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
a20f12
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
8 /16
16/32
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
May 2012
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
13.33k points
84.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
588.16k points
1037.15k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
18.18k (x2.94)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
24.29k (x4.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
13.01k (x6.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
29.85k (x11.91)
TOTAL
16.7k
85.34k (x5.11)

Multithread

E5-4640

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
221.35k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
350.39k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
188.52k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
29.4k (x4.35)
TOTAL
581.63k
789.66k (x1.36)

Performance/W
E5-4640
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2578 points/W
2108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2267 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1207 points/W
1795 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
280 points/W
TOTAL
6122 points/W
7521 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-4640
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2210 points/GHz
3710 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2105 points/GHz
4958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
2656 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
895 points/GHz
6092 points/GHz
TOTAL
5966 points/GHz
17415 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4