Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs N100
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 11.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 11.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
b06e0
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/4
TDP
135 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
15.23k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
11.04k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
5.54k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
4.98k (x1.65)
TOTAL
39.29k
36.79k (x0.94)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
37.07k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
32.57k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
14.75k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
3.9k (x0.16)
TOTAL
1023.68k
88.29k (x0.09)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4