| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i7-8650U


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 5.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/8
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
173.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
21.61k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
19.69k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
4.61k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
9.95k (x3.3)
TOTAL
39.29k
55.86k (x1.42)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
78.38k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
72.02k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
16.95k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
6.15k (x0.25)
TOTAL
1023.68k
173.49k (x0.17)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
11566 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4