| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i7-10610U


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 6.3 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ec
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/8
TDP
135 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
23.1k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
20k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
4.61k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
8.94k (x2.96)
TOTAL
39.29k
56.65k (x1.44)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
73.36k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
68.28k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
13.73k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
6.62k (x0.27)
TOTAL
1023.68k
162k (x0.16)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4