| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i5-8500T


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 4.1 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/6
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
251.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
23.13k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
20.7k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
4.71k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
10.73k (x3.56)
TOTAL
39.29k
59.27k (x1.51)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
125.17k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
98.07k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
25.57k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
3.01k (x0.12)
TOTAL
1023.68k
251.82k (x0.25)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
3576 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
2802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
731 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
7195 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
6608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
16934 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4