| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i5-7300U


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 9.4 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806e9
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
16/32
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
109.1k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
20.18k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
18.57k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
4.24k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.25k (x1.74)
TOTAL
39.29k
48.25k (x1.23)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
47.75k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
44.82k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
10.82k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
5.7k (x0.23)
TOTAL
1023.68k
109.1k (x0.11)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
3184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
2988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
380 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
7273 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
5766 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
1501 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
13785 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4