| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i3-8130U


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 11.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
16/32
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
21.09k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
19.41k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
4.05k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.8k (x0.93)
TOTAL
39.29k
47.35k (x1.2)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
38.23k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
38.89k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
8.75k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
2.47k (x0.1)
TOTAL
1023.68k
88.35k (x0.09)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4