Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2698 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2698 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a60f12
Core
Haswell-EP
Dragon Range
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/32
TDP
135 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
65536 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
1313.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
37.43k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
30.7k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
15.16k (x3.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
29.78k (x9.87)
TOTAL
39.29k
113.07k (x2.88)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
556.68k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
482.32k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
225.46k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
49.48k (x2.02)
TOTAL
1023.68k
1313.94k (x1.28)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
23890 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4