Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 5900X gets 816 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 5900X gets 816 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a20f12
Core
Haswell-EP
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/32
12/24
TDP
135 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
September 2014
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
83.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
816.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
22.58k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
24.83k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
11.23k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
24.78k (x8.22)
TOTAL
39.29k
83.42k (x2.12)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
259.31k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
343.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
155.92k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
57.66k (x2.35)
TOTAL
1023.68k
816.01k (x0.8)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
3268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
1485 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
549 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
7772 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
4704 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5172 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
2340 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
17379 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4