Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Ryzen 7 7700X
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 7700X is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 7700X gets 809 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 7700X gets 809 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a60f12
Core
Haswell-EP
Raphael
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM5
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
135 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
115.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
808.98k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
38.95k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
30.25k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
15.85k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
30.92k (x10.25)
TOTAL
39.29k
115.97k (x2.95)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
337.42k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
274.79k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
145.12k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
51.64k (x2.11)
TOTAL
1023.68k
808.98k (x0.79)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
3214 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
2617 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
492 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
7705 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
7212 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
2935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
5726 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
21475 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4